It’s time for another Crosswords release. This is relatively soon after the last one, but I have an unofficial rule that Crosswords is released after three bloggable features. We’ve been productive and blown way past that bar in only a few months, so it’s time for an update.
This round, we redid the game interface (for GNOME Circle) and added content to the editor. The editor also gained printing support, and we expanded support for Adwaita accent colors. In details:
New Layout GNOME Crosswords’ new look — now using the accent colorI applied for GNOME Circle a couple years ago, but it wasn’t until this past GUADEC that I was able to sit down together with Tobias to take a closer look at the game. We sketched out a proposed redesign, and I’ve been implementing it for the last four months. The result: a much cleaner look and workflow. I really like the way it has grown.
Initial redesignOverall, I’m really happy with the way it looks and feels so far. The process has been relatively smooth (details), though it’s clear that the design team has limited resources to spend on these efforts. They need more help, and I hope that team can grow. Here’s how the game looks now:
https://blogs.gnome.org/jrb/files/2026/02/main-1.webmI really could use help with the artwork for this project! Jakub made some sketches and I tried to convert them to svg, but have reached the limits of my inkscape skills. If you’re interested in helping and want to get involved in GNOME Design artwork, this could be a great place to start. Let me know!
Indicator HintsTime for some crossword nerdery:
Indicator Hints Dialog Main ScreenOne thing that characterizes cryptic crosswords is that its clues feature wordplay. A key part of the wordplay is called an “indicator hint”. These hints are a word — or words — that tell you to transform neighboring words into parts of the solutions. These transformations could be things like rearranging the letters (anagrams) or reversing them. The example in the dialog screenshot below might give a better sense of how these work. There’s a whole universe built around this.
Indicator Hint Dialog with an exampleGood clues always use evocative indicator hints to entertain or mislead the solver. To help authors, I install a database of common indicator hints compiled by George Ho and show a random subset. His list also includes how frequently they’re used, which can be used to make a clue harder or easier to solve.
Indicator Hints Dialog with full list of indicators Templates and SettabilityI’ve always been a bit embarrassed about the New Puzzle dialog. The dialog should be simple enough: select a puzzle type, puzzle size, and maybe a preset grid template. Unfortunately, it historically had a few weird bugs and the template thumbnailing code was really slow. It could only render twenty or so templates before the startup time became unbearable. As a result, I only had a pitiful four or five templates per type of puzzle.
When Toluwaleke rewrote the thumbnail rendering to be blazing fast over the summer, it became possible to give this section a closer look. The result:
https://blogs.gnome.org/jrb/files/2026/02/greeter.webmNote: The rendering issues with the theme words dialog is GTK Bug #7400
The new dialog now has almost a thousand curated blank grids to pick from, sorted by how difficult they are to fill. In addition, I added initial support to add Theme Words to the puzzle. Setting theme words will also filter the templates to only show those that fit. Some cool technical details:
I had the good fortune to be able to sit with one of my coworkers and watch her use the editor. She’s a much more accomplished setter than I, and publishes her crosswords in newspapers. Watching her use the tool was really helpful as she highlighted a lot of issues with the application (list). It was also great to validate a few of my big design decisions, notably splitting grid creation from clue writing.
I’ve fixed most of the easy issues she found, but she confirmed something I suspected: The big missing feature for the editor is an overlay indicating tricky cells and dead ends (bug). Victor proposed a solution (link) for this over the summer. This is now the top priority for the next release.
ThanksUntil next time!
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Pystd is an experiment on what a C++ standard library without any backwards compatibility requirements would look like. It's design goals are in order of decreasing priority:
There is a bunch of stuff implemented, like vector, several string types, hashmap, a B-tree based ordered map, regular expressions, unix path manipulation operations and so on. The latest addition has been sort algorithms, which include merge sort, heap sort and introsort.
None of these is "production quality". They will almost certainly have bugs. Don't rely on them for "real work".
The actual library consists of approximately 4800 lines of headers and 4700 lines of source. Building the library and all test code on a Raspberry Pi using a single core takes 13 seconds. With 30 process invocations this means approximately 0.4 seconds per compilation.
For real world testing we have really only one data point, but in it build time was reduced by three quarters, the binary became smaller and the end result ran faster.
PortabilityThe code has been tested on Linux x86_64 and aarch64 as well as on macOS. It currently does not work with Visual Studio which has not implemented support for pack indexing yet.
Why should you consider using it?Back in the 90s and 00s (I think) it was fashionable to write your own C++ standard library implementation. Eventually they all died and people moved to the one that comes with their compiler. Which is totally reasonable. So why would you now switch to something else?
For existing C++ applications you probably don't want to. The amount of work needed for a port is too much to be justified in most cases.
For green field projects things are more interesting. Maybe you just want to try something new just for the fun of it? That is the main reason why Pystd even exists, I wanted to try implementing the core building blocks of a standard library from scratch.
Maybe you want to provide "Go style" binaries that build fast and have no external deps? The size overhead of Pystd is only a few hundred k and the executables it yields only depend on libc (unless you use regexes, in which case they also depend on libpcre, but you can static link it if you prefer).
Resource constrained or embedded systems might also be an option. Libstdc++ takes a few megabytes. Pystd does require malloc, though (more specifically it requires aligned alloc) so for the smallest embedded targets you'd need to use something like the freestanding library. As an additional feature Pystd permits you to disable parts of the library that are not used (currently only regexes, but could be extended to things like threading and file system).
Compiler implementers might choose to test their performance with an unusual code base. For example GCC compiles most Pystd files in a flash but for some reason the B-tree implementation takes several seconds to build. I don't really know why because it does not do any heavy duty metaprogramming or such.
It might also be usable in teaching as a fairly small implementation of the core algorithms used today. Assuming anyone does education any more as opposed to relying on LLMs for everything.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.