Agreguesi i feed

Independent music publisher Round Hill is suing Suno and Anthropic for allegedly using hundreds of copyrighted songs without permission to train their AI systems. The company says potential damages could exceed $1 billion, arguing there is "nothing fair" about building multibillion-dollar AI businesses on copyrighted material while rights holders receive nothing. From The Hollywood Reporter: Round Hill is a prominent music publisher whose copyrights include the Goo Goo Dolls' "Iris," Bonnie Tyler's "Total Eclipse of the Heart," the Kinks' "Lola" and Dio's "Holy Diver." The company provided a list of 500 songs that the defendants had infringed upon. Round Hill said in the suits that the company plans to "amend to list potentially ten thousand or more of their musical compositions," with those damages potentially exceeding $1 billion. "While in other cases for copyright infringement, Defendant has waxed poetic about the necessity of progress and AI's value to society, there is simply no reason -- other than rote expediency -- to have that progress come at the cost of copyrights holders," prominent music attorney Richard Busch, representing Round Hill, wrote in the suits. Round Hill further argued that the latter "'expediency' arguments completely falter" when taking into account Suno and Anthropic's significant cash valuations they've earned while "exploiting illicit copies of copyrighted works, including the Round Hill Works." "There is simply nothing fair about a company using theft to build for purely commercial purposes a multi-billion dollar business while those from which they steal receive nothing," Round Hill said. Suno also faces a lawsuit from Universal Music Group and Sony Music Group.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

CISA says the Medusa ransomware operation has breached more than 500 U.S. critical infrastructure organizations since 2021, up from more than 300 reported last year. The group has targeted healthcare, government, defense, manufacturing, IT and financial organizations, evolving into a ransomware-as-a-service operation that recruits initial-access brokers and uses stolen data to pressure victims into paying. BleepingComputer reports: The three federal agencies recommended that network defenders secure their networks against the ransomware group's attacks by mitigating security vulnerabilities to protect operating systems, software, and firmware from exploitation attempts. Security teams are also advised to segment networks to block lateral movement after compromise and to block access from untrusted origins to remote services on internal systems. [...] "Medusa developers typically recruit initial access brokers (IABs) in cybercriminal forums and marketplaces to obtain initial access to potential victims," the advisory says. "Potential payments between $100 USD and $1 million USD are offered to these affiliates with the opportunity to work exclusively for Medusa."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Moderna and Merck say their personalized mRNA melanoma vaccine significantly reduced both cancer recurrence and spread in a late-stage trial. The treatment could reach patients as soon as next year if regulators approve it. Reuters reports: Moderna developed the vaccine with Merck and tested it together with immunotherapy drug Keytruda, a widely used treatment for melanoma. [...] This is the first positive late-stage trial result for an mRNA cancer vaccine, which trains a patient's immune system to fight tumors by targeting specific mutations in those cells and the first such study to show that adding a treatment to Keytruda worked better than that therapy alone. Similar approaches are being tested against lung, breast and pancreatic cancers. [...] The cancer treatment combines Merck's Keytruda with a made-to-order mRNA vaccine from Moderna that is based on an analysis of mutations found in the patients' own tumors. The trial enrolled 1,137 high-risk patients with stage IIB-IV melanoma that had been surgically removed. Volunteers were randomized to receive up to nine doses of Keytruda plus the personalized vaccine or Keytruda alone for about one year. The companies said no new safety signals have emerged in the trial. In January, the companies announced results of a mid-stage trial of the treatment showing that it reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 49% after five years. Karen Knudsen, CEO of the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, said the Moderna results could signal a new era for treating solid-tumor cancers. "The positive hit here leads us into truly this next phase in immunotherapy," Knudsen said. "This is an auspicious start -- this is where things begin." Moderna shares more than doubled on the news, adding about $30 billion to its market value.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media: X's algorithm learns what you hate and shows you more of it, according to a new study just published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The paper, titled Value misalignment of X's feed algorithm is a reflection of value tensions in engagement, found that the site's algorithm prioritized engagement above all else when it generated a user's For You Page. It also showed that X serves more ragebait to people who say they are Democrats, although the exact reason for that is unclear. "In 2026 that's maybe not the most surprising headline ever," Ziv Epstein, a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University, and co-author of the paper, told 404 Media. "So we actually dug in a little deeper to figure out why this is actually happening, and it turns out that X's feed algorithm, like a lot of these social media algorithms, is optimized for engagement [but] it turns out that not all types of engagement are considered equally." The researchers found that X's algorithm can push users toward content that conflicts with their stated values, especially when they reply to posts that anger or provoke them. Although replies accounted for just 6.8% of interactions, they appeared to carry disproportionate weight: "It's this feedback loop of outrage baiting. The algorithm learns that you get outraged and then continues to serve more content in that direction," said Epstein. It's unclear why X seems to serve ragebait to Democrats more often than Republicans. 404 Media speculates that it may be because there's more rightwing content on X overall or that Democrats tend to engage with posts they disagree with more often. "There might be some kind of differential effects on information diets there, or it might be something more psychological about how different you know partisan identities are triggering different kinds of actions and reactions, but ultimately I don't want to speculate too much," said Epstein. X's former product chief Nikita Bier confirmed that the site had been set to favor replies. "This is no longer true," Bier said in a post on X. "The largest contributor of seeing ragebait was the reply predictor and we were aware that angry replies were causing people to see more of that content. So last month, we gave the reply predictor a 15x boost if it's a friend's post -- and it reduced ragebait by [an] order of magnitude."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Version:7.1.9 (stable) Released:2026-08-19 Source:linux-7.1.9.tar.xz PGP Signature:linux-7.1.9.tar.sign Patch:full (incremental) ChangeLog:ChangeLog-7.1.9

Version:6.18.45 (longterm) Released:2026-08-19 Source:linux-6.18.45.tar.xz PGP Signature:linux-6.18.45.tar.sign Patch:full (incremental) ChangeLog:ChangeLog-6.18.45

Version:6.12.104 (longterm) Released:2026-08-19 Source:linux-6.12.104.tar.xz PGP Signature:linux-6.12.104.tar.sign Patch:full (incremental) ChangeLog:ChangeLog-6.12.104

Version:6.6.152 (longterm) Released:2026-08-19 Source:linux-6.6.152.tar.xz PGP Signature:linux-6.6.152.tar.sign Patch:full (incremental) ChangeLog:ChangeLog-6.6.152

A U.S. Army battalion at Fort Stewart is offering soldiers a four-day pass timed to the release of Grand Theft Auto VI if they reenlist for at least two years. The program is limited to one unit for now, but it fits the Army's broader effort to appeal to gamers as a recruiting and retention pool. CBS News reports: Twenty soldiers at Fort Stewart in Georgia in the Army's 9th Brigade Engineering Battalion, part of the 3rd Infantry Division, have already chosen this incentive as part of their reenlistment, an Army spokesperson told CBS News on Wednesday. "The idea was to have a unique incentives program that connects to what Soldiers are interested in," Lt. Col. Angel Tomko, a spokesperson for the 3rd Infantry Division, said in a statement. "The command team, in conjunction with the career counselor, wanted to get soldiers excited to reenlist." [...] The Army memo, which has circulated online, says any soldier who signs a reenlistment contract between Aug. 1, 2026 and Nov. 14 will be authorized for a special four-day pass designated to coincide with "the highly anticipated release of the video game Grand Theft Auto VI (GTA 6)." About 130 soldiers are currently eligible for the incentive, Tomko said. Eligible soldiers must reenlist for a minimum of two years and up to six years.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

It’s already a month since we were in Spain for GUADEC and I still haven’t gotten around to writing something, so before I completely forget here are a few quick impressions and photos!

Local-First

Similar to last year, my main focus was on local-first, since that’s what I’ve mostly been working on recently. Julian and I gave a talk about Reflection and the p2panda-gobject bindings, and more generally plans for making local-first sync part of the GNOME developer platform.

Julian showing off p2panda-gobject during the BoF on Sunday

We also had a local-first BoF to discuss system integration on Sunday, and a p2panda-goject workshop on Monday where we prototyped the Migrations app Jakub designed. Both were really well-attended, and it was super cool to see people starting to prototype their own little experiments that sync, including a collaborative Snake game, and a collaborative drawing app.

Blackboard at the local-first BoF with some notes on the Contacts and Sync portals

Our current thinking around system integration is that we wan to have two separate portals: one for Contacts, which would just manage P2P identities (so apps don’t have to each have their own identity system and contacts management), and a second one that actually syncs data on behalf of apps using a system API. For the former there is already a relatively detailed plan (see the talk linked above), and this will be prototyped as part of a p2panda NLnet grant.

This entire area is of course still experimental so all plans are subject to change, but it’s exciting to see things get more and more concrete over the past year.

Talks

Some of my favorite talks:

• Session Save/Restore by Adrian Vovk: Really cool to see the progress in this area, but also incredible how many moving parts are involved in getting this to just work. Kudos to Adrian and everyone else who’s helping to push this forward!
• Foundation Annual General Meeting by Allan Day: Really clear and concise overview of where the Foundation is at, what changes have been made to make it more financially sustainable, and what challenges still persist. The fellowship in particular is a very nice, tangible new thing and at least to me a sign that some things have changed for the better. I found this framing particularly interesting: the Foundation is a corporation, and the AGM is a meeting for “shareholders”, i.e. people who invest their time (rather than their money) in the Foundation, to assess whether the investment is well managed.
• The Future of Boxes by Felipe Borges: I’m very happy to see Boxes revived and modernized, it’s a secret gem of our app ecosystem. Kudos to Felipe for his work on this!
• A Brief History of Graphs by Sjoerd Stendahl: Very nice talk, and a great success story for how programs focused on the third-party app ecosystem like Circle can help to bring people into the community.
• GNOME OS Mobile lightning talk by Aberrahim Kitouni: Between this and the Mobile BoF it was very nice to see more people across the community pushing towards making mobile an official part of the GNOME release process.

Great to see new generations making old wisdoms their own :) City and Venue

The logistics of constantly going back and forth between the Rialta dorms, the University building, and the city center made the social side of the conference more difficult than in other years, especially because public transit stopped relatively early in the evening. As usual, the smart move would probably have been to stay in the city center, but that only goes so far if everyone else is staying at the official accommodation, which is far away. More generally, the A Coruña city center was cute, but other parts of the city felt really car-centric and not very fun to be in.

The view from the hill was pretty cool though :) Meta

I found it a bit sad that once again, we didn’t manage to use the fact that so many people were together in person to make progress on resolving the conflicts of the past few years. I didn’t see it as my responsibility to take care of this, and I assume everyone else felt the same way. But here’s an idea for next year: An official “Conflict Resolution BoF”, chaired by a trained mediator.

If there’s any interest I’d be happy to co-organize something like this, but I wouldn’t want to be solely responsible for it.

More Photos

Local-first workshop on Monday Philipp at the Design BoF The Mobile BoF People hacking at the university Traditional GUADEC dinner

See you next year!

Version:6.1.183 (longterm) Released:2026-08-19 Source:linux-6.1.183.tar.xz PGP Signature:linux-6.1.183.tar.sign Patch:full (incremental) ChangeLog:ChangeLog-6.1.183

Version:5.15.216 (longterm) Released:2026-08-19 Source:linux-5.15.216.tar.xz PGP Signature:linux-5.15.216.tar.sign Patch:full (incremental) ChangeLog:ChangeLog-5.15.216

Version:5.10.265 (longterm) Released:2026-08-19 Source:linux-5.10.265.tar.xz PGP Signature:linux-5.10.265.tar.sign Patch:full (incremental) ChangeLog:ChangeLog-5.10.265

Chinese robotics giant Unitree surged more than 600% in its Shanghai stock market debut, marking the first mainland Chinese listing by a humanoid robot maker and a major milestone for Beijing's robotics ambitions. The BBC reports: Unitree, officially known as Yushu Technology Co Ltd, was founded in 2016 and now plays a key role in Beijing's ambitions to develop advanced technology. It has become a robotics industry leader, selling devices from sensors and automated arms to four-legged and human-like machines. The firm shipped more than 5,500 humanoid robots last year as demand for the technology grows. Unitree is one of the few companies in the sector to make money, delivering a net profit of 278 million yuan in 2025. It is a fierce rival to developers in the US as it produces robots with similar features but at lower prices. The company is based in Hangzhou, in eastern China. The region is home to a so-called golden cluster zone of robotics firms, which have benefited from huge government investments. That support helped drive a more than threefold increase in the number of Chinese robotics firms between 2020 and 2024, according to state-run China Daily. [...] Unitree's robot dogs start at $2,700, a fraction of the roughly $70,000 price tag for Boston Dynamics' four-legged device, Spot. "They're not exactly comparable because some of Unitree's dogs are much smaller," [said Harold Soh, a researcher from the National University of Singapore]. "But the price is a big difference." Unitree has been selling humanoid robots since 2023, with its $13,500 child-sized G1 model hitting the market the following year. Meanwhile, major US rivals -- including Elon Musk's Tesla -- have yet to start delivering rival products. [...] Some experts expect Unitree's market debut to be a gauge of investor appetite for the fast-growing humanoid robotics sector. The listing has given the public a rare chance to invest in a humanoid robotics company and could set a benchmark for other manufacturers, said Jack Pearson from investment firm RoboStrategy. The listing also marks a "turning point" for China's robotics industry, as Unitree's success comes even as the US is curbing imports of foreign-made robots, Pearson said.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Version:next-20260819 (linux-next) Released:2026-08-19

A study of more than 64,000 people born around the end of Britain's postwar sugar rationing found that those exposed to less sugar during their first 1,000 days had lower rates of five cancers decades later, including roughly 69% lower liver cancer risk and 36% lower breast cancer risk. They also "showed signs of slower biological aging" and "continued to consume less sugar and had healthier diets overall," according to the authors of a new study published in The Conversation. From the report: After the second world war, sugar remained rationed in Britain for several years. But in September 1953, rationing ended and people started eating a lot more sugar. Consumption nearly doubled. This meant that children born just a few months apart had very different levels of sugar exposure both in the womb and during early childhood. For our study, we used data from over 64,000 people born in Britain between 1951 and 1956. Those born earlier spent a larger share of their first 1,000 days under sugar rationing, while those born later experienced progressively less of it. [...] What is most surprising, however, is not the cancer results or the biological markers of ageing. It's how early-life sugar exposure continued to affect people's diets even 50 years later. We found that people who experienced sugar rationing early in life still consumed less sugar in adulthood, around age 50. They also ate less overall, and their diets were healthier and more diverse. This suggests that the level of sweetness people are exposed to very early in life may shape their taste preferences for a long time.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Earlier this month, I published a post about the future of Boxes where I detailed the huge technical rewrite I have been doing, porting to GTK4, Libadwaita, and replacing our SPICE display widget with Libmks. Today, I want to share a structural decision that aligns with that vision and sets up the project for long-term health/sustainability.

I have formally submitted a proposal to remove Boxes from the core-developer-tools set in gnome-build-meta and transition it towards becoming an independent application (with the ultimate goal of applying for GNOME Circle once all criteria are met).

I want to dive into why I am making this move, what it means for users and maintainers, and why I believe this is the right path forward.

There is No Drama Here

First off, let’s get this out of the way: there is zero drama between Boxes and the GNOME project.

Boxes continues to be built by the same core set of contributors, fully committed to the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines (HIG) and deeply integrated into our ecosystem. We aren’t stepping away from GNOME. We are simply right-sizing how Boxes is categorized, distributed, and maintained.

Why Boxes Shouldn’t Be “Core” (and Why Versioning with the OS is Outdated)

The desktop Linux landscape is shifting toward image-based operating systems with atomic updates and immutability. In this model, the underlying operating system provides a slim, reliable base, while applications live on top and update independently at their own pace.

Tying a complex application like Boxes to the biannual GNOME release schedule is not useful anymore. It forces us to hold back features and bug fixes for months just to align with the OS cadence, when users should simply get updates when they are ready and stable.

Furthermore, virtualization isn’t an essential utility that needs to be pre-installed on every single user’s machine by default. Boxes fits much better as a targeted application users explicitly choose to install when they need it.

Flathub-First: Moving Fast and Ending Distribution Bottlenecks

As a maintainer, maintaining separate code paths and stable branches for dozens of traditional distribution packages is simply not sustainable long-term. I can no longer afford to maintain multiple stable branches. Moving forward, I am simplifying maintenance down to one stable branch and one development/nightly branch. To make this sustainable, Flathub is our primary and only officially supported distribution method.

By bundling the virtualization stack in our Flatpak, we ensure that users get a much more tested, consistent, and working virtualization backend regardless of what operating system they are running.

Moving out of Core allows us to heavily discourage downstreams from individually packaging Boxes. Instead, distros should defer their users to the official Flatpak on Flathub. If you are filing bug reports or seeking support, the Flathub build will be the baseline.

Branding and Infrastructure Changes

To reflect this independent status, a few logistical changes are happening alongside this move. We are dropping “GNOME” from the user-facing app branding. Going forward, it will simply be named “Boxes”,  and we will soon be moving to a new website domain (which is currently being finalized). Importantly, our Flatpak application ID will remain org.gnome.Boxes for full continuity and compatibility. This means existing installations, user settings, and Flatpak configurations won’t break, and users won’t need to reinstall anything.

What’s Next?

This change gives us the flexibility to release updates whenever features are ready, iterate faster, and dramatically reduce maintainer burnout, all while delivering a more reliable and consistent user experience via Flathub. Once we settle into this new cadence and finalize our transition, we plan to apply for GNOME Circle.

To set clear expectations on timing: since Boxes currently uses GTK3 in its stable releases, we will soon submit an application for GNOME Circle review following our GTK4/Libadwaita rewrite.

If the Circle application is approved before the GNOME 52 Alpha deadline, the plan is to proceed with the removal from core-developer-tools and transition to Circle in time for the GNOME 52 release in March 2027.

For distribution maintainers wondering about upcoming distro releases: distros targeting GNOME 51 can continue to package the GNOME 50 release of Boxes, which will remain supported for the standard lifecycle of that release. If everything goes according to plan, GNOME 52 won’t include Boxes in the core set anymore. At this point, please don’t package Boxes anymore.

alternative_right shares a report from Phys.org: Optical fibers are already the backbone of global communication systems. Recently, however, physicists have started to explore how their functionality could be boosted further by conveying information via entangled quantum particles -- potentially enabling instantaneous exchanges of information across vast distances. Such a system could eventually be the basis of a future 'quantum internet,' offering a level of security and computing power beyond anything possible today. In new research published in Physical Review Letters, a team led by Xi-Yu Luo at the University of Science and Technology of China in Hefei has pushed that vision further than ever, entangling two quantum memories across 420 kilometers (261 miles) of optical fiber -- more than four times the previous record.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: The release of a new album by Taylor Swift might be a cause for celebration among her fans, but such events have also been linked to a more sombre phenomenon: an increase in fatal car crashes. The team behind a new study say it sheds light on the impact of distracted driving. Writing in the journal Jama Network Open, [Vishal Patel, first author of the study based at Harvard Medical School] and colleagues report how they focused on the release of 10 major albums, launched between 2017 and 2022, selected for having the highest number of Spotify streams over a single day. [...] The team found streaming volume for the top 200 songs in the US was 43% higher on the date of major album releases compared with the days surrounding the releases -- although such data does not reveal whether the music was being streamed in a car. [...] The researchers used data from a population-based registry of fatal US motor vehicle crashes to look at the number of traffic fatalities on the dates these albums were released, as well as for the 10 days either side. After taking into account the day of the week upon which the album was released, as well as federal holidays, and time of year, the researchers found the number of US traffic fatalities showed a relative increase of 15.1% on the date of major album releases, compared with similar days either side. "This is equivalent to approximately 182 fatalities in the US attributable to the release days of the 10 included albums," the team writes. Patel said the release of a new album could distract drivers because accessing music is a search task, not a single button press. "You unlock the phone, open the app, find the release, read down a tracklist, tap the right song. That's several seconds of looking at a screen," he said, adding unfamiliar music also demands more attention, while research has suggested listening to new, high-energy music measurably degrades driving performance. The researchers add the rise in traffic fatalities was greater among certain groups -- such as younger drivers, male drivers, people who were driving alone, and people driving cars with a built-in infotainment platform. The authors say the results suggest that "online music streaming through smartphones may significantly contribute to distracted driving and traffic fatalities."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

When an authentication platform goes down, downstream applications go with it. Employees can't sign in, customers get locked out, and scheduled jobs quietly fail.